home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!DREW.DREW.EDU!WKIMLER
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- X-Envelope-to: politics@ohstvma.bitnet
- X-VMS-To: IN%"politics@ohstvma.bitnet"
- Message-ID: <01GT3GZLLCXS001YK0@drew.drew.edu>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1993 21:10:00 EST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: WKIMLER@DREW.DREW.EDU
- Subject: homosexuality and genetics
- Comments: To: politics@ohstvma.bitnet
- Lines: 15
-
- In the year just past there was some scientific discussion as to
- whether or not homosexuality was a genetic or physical trait. I'm not
- sure as to the exact details but one of the studies indicated that the
- size and/or shape of the brains of homosexual men were different than that
- of heterosexual men. But as far as I can recall, the studies were still
- inconclusive.
-
- Supposing that homosexuality is a genetic trait (such as having
- blue eyes or blonde hair) would you out there, who feel homosexual feelings
- and actions are immoral, reconsider your thoughts on the discrimination
- laws in Colorado and other places?
- Would religious beliefs and doctrines need to be updated? Obviously
- you cannot call something which is genetic sinful.
-
- - billy clyde
-