home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UNC.OIT.UNC.EDU!UNCPJS
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- Message-ID: <POLITICS%92123016541855@UCF1VM.CC.UCF.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1992 16:52:00 EST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: "Peter J. Schledorn" <UNCPJS@UNC.OIT.UNC.EDU>
- Subject: Re: abortion
- Comments: To: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.CC.UCF.EDU>
- Lines: 42
-
- > BTW - Suppose that there aren't enough of MDs qualified and willing to
- > perform abortions. What do we do? Do we force them to take training
- > and perform them anyway despite their personal preferences? After
- > all, they're advertising in public that they're MDs and abortion is a
- > medical procedure. Since their refusal "restricts" (Peter's defn)
- > women's abortion rights, shouldn't we bring in the thugs?
-
- As a matter of fact, no. Andy shows us once again his ability to twist
- anything into an ad hominem, and also to distort his reporting of
- the positions of others to the point of rampant dishonesty. If you
- can't make a point without lying, Andy, you might want to avoid making
- a point at all.
-
- A doctor, obviously, has the right to choose what kind of medicine to
- practice. Just as a car dealer has the right to choose whether to sell
- Chevys or Jeeps. But they do not have the right to arbitrarily refuse
- to serve certain portions of the public, such as blacks, or gays, or
- what have you. A doctor who performs abortions for white women but not
- for black women is restricting their right to get an abortion. A lung
- specialist who performs no abortions at all is not.
-
- The offence here is the denial of the opportunity to participate fully
- in the life of our economy and society to certain arbitrarily chosen
- members of that society. Therefore it makes no difference if there is a
- doctor or a car dealer right next door willing to serve that person.
- Their rights have been violated whether there is another willing dealer
- or not. There is no right to act like a bigot in public. There is a
- right to be a bigot, obviously, but actions leading from that bigotry
- which harm others are rightly prohibited outside your own home (and
- maybe even there, depending on the harm caused). And when bigots do
- cause harm to others, it is they who become the real thugs, and the rest
- of us have the right to defend ourselves against them. There are far
- more private thugs than publically-employed ones, and most of them
- practice their thuggery without regard for the state of the law.
-
- Maybe someday Andy will learn that a campaign for the right to act like
- a bigot makes a pretty sorry campaign.
-
- Best,
- Peter
-
- > -andy
-