home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SUADMIN.BITNET!EBEDGERT
- Message-ID: <POLITICS%92122311024943@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 11:01:00 ET
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: "Ellen.Edgerton" <EBEDGERT@SUADMIN.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Cross controversy?
- In-Reply-To: The letter of Wednesday, 23 December 1992 10:53am ET
- Lines: 15
-
- Agreed about the bad name Libertarians get, Brett, but maybe if Lyndon
- LaRouchewasn't their best-known proponent, they wouldn't have that image. :)
-
- My question is, Why do we have to have libertarianism? Why do we have to
- have socialism, or other -isms that tend to that end of the spectrum? What's
- wrong with democracy?
-
- If democracy "doesn't work," what makes you think libertarianism would work?
-
- Of course, democracy includes libertarianism and socialism. :)
-
- So, in the end I think we'll be okay.
-
-
- Ellen
-