home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU!U9AA
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- Message-ID: <23DEC92.08293535.0011.MUSIC@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 07:40:44 CST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: "rufus t. firefly" <U9AA@SDSUMUS.SDSTATE.EDU>
- Subject: re:re: freedom of speech
- Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
- In-Reply-To: In reply to your message of TUE 22 DEC 1992 17:11:27 CST
- Lines: 20
-
- > Let's have a contest.
- >
- > Who can be MORE in favor of freedom of speech for those with whom
- > you disagree?
- >
- > I'll go first. (oops, too late for that.)
- >
- > I am in favor of freedom of speech for Nazis, Stalinists, cat-torturers,
- > Rush Limbaugh, fast food restaurants, Freudians, Libertarians,
- > Alabamans, and every other odious ideologue I can think of.
- >
- > Wow. Controversial, huh?
- >
- > Jamie
- >
-
- i'm in favor of freedom of speech for all of the above, plus nambla,
- holocaust revisionists, and straight white republican males. so there.
-
- rtf
-