home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!ADMINB.RFERL.ORG!BADERTINOVS
- X-Delivery-Notice: SMTP MAIL FROM does not correspond to sender.
- X-VMS-To: ADMINB::NEWS::IN%"POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu"
- X-VMS-Cc: BADERTINOVS
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GSMFYMT3BM8Y5AO4@MUVAXJ.RFERL.ORG>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 16:47:07 +0100
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: BADERTINOVS%NEWS@ADMINB.RFERL.ORG
- Subject: Re: Cross controversy?
- Comments: To: POLITICS@ucf1vm.cc.ucf.edu
- Lines: 9
-
- I think that you are right, it shouldn't matter whose freedom of speech
- is being curtailed. It is dangerous even if it is directed against the
- KKK. When the ACLU defended the neo-Nazis in Skokie it was totally
- justified. I hate neo-Nazis and the KKK people, but I am convinced
- that if we don't defend their right to freedom of speech, our rights
- can eventually be curtailed as well. It is important not to set
- precedents.
-
- Sam.
-