home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!SAIL.STANFORD.EDU!ANDY
- Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University.
- Message-ID: <9212212150.AA13051@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 13:50:59 -0800
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: Andy Freeman <andy@SAIL.STANFORD.EDU>
- Subject: Re: rush, wwf, "sport"
- In-Reply-To: <POLITICS%92121815064638@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Lines: 15
-
- > Before we dialogue on the meaning of "sport" ...
- >
- > let us first agree on basic principle recognized by all civiliz-
- > persons - bolwing is NOT a "sport."
-
- Hmm. Silly shoes - check. Silly shirts - check. "Objective" scoring
- - check. The tools aren't supposed to matter - check. "Technique"
- can be more important than raw strength/speed - check.
-
- Why isn't bowling a sport if football (soccer, Oz rules, or US),
- baseball, cricket, volleyball, basketball, track&field, tennis, pool,
- etc is?
-
- -andy
- --
-