home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!BROWNVM.BITNET!PL436000
- Message-ID: <POLITICS%92122116032097@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.politics
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 15:58:15 EST
- Sender: Forum for the Discussion of Politics <POLITICS@UCF1VM.BITNET>
- From: Jamie <PL436000@BROWNVM.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: left-right
- Lines: 34
-
- >From: Grzegorz Albinowski <caius@II.UJ.EDU.PL>
-
- >My look at these matters has always been:
- >
- >---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
- > Leftism | Rightism
- >---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
- > anti-individualistic | pro-individualistic
- > |
- > "All individual resources | "the state wealthy by the the
- > should be allocated to the | wealth of its citizens"
- > prosperity of the state" |
- > |
- > "welfare" state | "no free lunch"
- > |
- >---------------------------------+------------------------------------------
-
- Well, then, we have a choice. Either we can all keep Caius's
- chart in mind, as a kind of iconic definition of his idiolectic
- meaning of "Leftism" and "Rightism," or he can try using more
- standard words. I prefer the latter, but am willing to try the
- former. (Hey, Jimbo, doesn't this paragraph remind you of Zeleny?)
-
- >Thats why I put all flavours of socialism (Marxism, Nazism, Soviet Communism)
- >on the left.
-
- Well, that appears to be an error, even according to your own chart.
- Many socialists are individualists. (I would even count MARX as an
- individualist, actually!) Many socialists are against the welfare state.
- Many socialists are opposed to state control of resources (e.g., Noam
- Chomsky).
-
- Terminologically yours,
- Jamie
-