home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UCLAMVS.BITNET!CSYSMAS
- Message-ID: <IBM-MAIN%92122323074748@RICEVM1.RICE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 21:05:00 PST
- Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion list <IBM-MAIN@RICEVM1.BITNET>
- From: Michael Stein <CSYSMAS@UCLAMVS.BITNET>
- Subject: Is PL/S a dead language?
- Lines: 9
-
- With all this talk of IBM reorganization and mainframes being
- dead, I'm wondering if IBM's PL/S is now a dead language?
-
- I haven't seen IBM trying to sell it as a product, which
- considering the shape their in, I'd figure they would try to sell
- anything they had, so perhaps it's effectively dead and it's
- internal use to be minimized.
-
- PS: How low does IBM's stock have to get for AT&T to buy them?
-