home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: bionet.women-in-bio
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!gatech!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!ayermish
- From: ayermish@leland.Stanford.EDU (Aimee Yermish)
- Subject: getting a PhD or not
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.232047.22194@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 23:20:47 GMT
- Lines: 29
-
- I've got to echo what other people have said about that PhD being a
- legitimizing degree. You've already put 4 years into it, if you can
- force yourself through another year or two, you'll save yourself a lot
- of time and trouble later if you realize that you really did want a
- PhD.
-
- That said, let me make a suggestion.
-
- When your advisor tells you to get a new career, get a new advisor.
- Two years ago, I was miserable and unhappy and seriously considering
- punting my own science career because I was having such problems with
- my advisor. Personality conflicts are very real, and they can make
- even the most fascinating work horrible. I worked very hard on
- choosing a new lab where I was not only interested in the science, but
- also confident that I would get along well with the PI. Don't let one
- bad apple ruin your life -- there are probably plenty of other PIs
- around who would be thrilled to have someone with the skills you have
- undoubtedly built up over the past four years, and with whom you would
- enjoy the cooperative effort and build a productive, pleasant
- relationship.
-
- I wrote an article for my program's grad student handbook on how to
- choose an advisor, based on my experience and the various stories I
- heard from the grapevine. If people would like, I'd be happy to post
- it.
-
- --Aimee
- ayermish@leland.stanford.edu
-
-