home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31 / NN_1992_31.iso / spool / ba / transpor / 2974 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-12-30  |  1.3 KB
  1. Xref: sparky ba.transportation:2974 sci.environment:14122 ca.environment:1134
  2. Newsgroups: ba.transportation,sci.environment,ca.environment
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!noose.ecn.purdue.edu!gn.ecn.purdue.edu!constant
  4. From: constant@gn.ecn.purdue.edu (Tino)
  5. Subject: Re: Natural Gas?
  6. Message-ID: <1992Dec31.024520.15429@gn.ecn.purdue.edu>
  7. Organization: Purdue University Engineering Computer Network
  8. References: <JMC.92Dec16171509@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> <ELM.92Dec16182200@terrorism.berkeley.edu> <1992Dec30.233732.24874@oracle.us.oracle.com>
  9. Date: Thu, 31 Dec 92 02:45:20 GMT
  10. Lines: 14
  11.  
  12. In article <1992Dec30.233732.24874@oracle.us.oracle.com> mfriedma@uucp (Michael Friedman) writes:
  13. >Not true.  I did a paper on this back in highschool.  In order to
  14. >provide a significant percentage of US energy needs you would need
  15. >whole farms devoted to nothing but producing biomass for methane
  16. >productions.  Straight solar is simpler, cheaper, and less polluting.
  17.  
  18. For what use?
  19.  
  20. Tino
  21. -- 
  22.      "Here are the young men, the weight on their shoulders..." - J.D.
  23. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  24.              Purdue University School of Nuclear Engineering
  25. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  26.