home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!kink!hugh
- From: hugh@kink.PhaedraV.On.Ca (Hugh D. Gamble)
- Newsgroups: alt.sys.amiga.uucp
- Subject: Re: proposal alt.sys.amiga.cnews/cnews.patches
- Message-ID: <q54bs*800@kink.PhaedraV.On.Ca>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 15:06:02 EST
- References: <ciaran.3jif@aldhfn.akron.oh.us> <rp7as*ST7@kink.PhaedraV.On.Ca>
- <211292f0948@hamburg.uucp>
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Phaedra V
- Lines: 33
-
- In article <211292f0948@hamburg.uucp>, Kai 'wusel' Siering writes:
-
- > % [ followups to alt.config,alt.sys.amiga.uucp People who don't get alt
- > % will have to manually change the newsgroups line to
- > % comp.sys.amiga.misc and/or comp.sys.amiga.datacomm ]
- >
- > Err ... Do you really think splitting a discussion is a good idea? =:-<
-
- No. Do you think you can get everyone a magic instant alt feed so it can
- all be in one place?
-
- I've shrunk this thread back down to alt.sys.amiga.uucp only for now.
-
- > % We need a formal discussion on the creation of comp.sys.amiga.news.sw.
- >
- > Don't really think so; the traffic in a.s.a.u isn't that high to
- > warrant a mainstream group ...
-
- Then why a separate alt group?
-
- I'm willing to start a discussion about comp.sys.amiga.news-sw at the
- same time as a discussion about moving a.s.a.u* to c.s.a.u* but only
- if there's a good reason. I don't even have to be convinced there's a
- good reason other than a lot of people would like a separate group for
- news and only talk about uucp (and mail?) in .uucp.
- (Hint: that means mail me or otherwise be vocal if you're sitting
- silently in the background)
-
- --
- # Hugh D. Gamble UUCP: hugh@kink.UUCP Domain: hugh@kink.PhaedraV.On.Ca %
- # AMIX: HGAMBLE bix: hgamble voice: +1 416 267 6159 %
- # %
- # CONSPICUOUS SILENCE HERE %
-