home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!psuvax1!rutgers!uwvax!uchinews!ellis!thf2
- From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
- Newsgroups: alt.folklore.urban
- Subject: Re: The Ultimate Circumcision
- Message-ID: <1993Jan2.225311.28856@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: 2 Jan 93 22:53:11 GMT
- References: <6068.434.uupcb@ehbbs.gwinnett.com>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago
- Lines: 69
-
- In article <6068.434.uupcb@ehbbs.gwinnett.com> curt.tucker@ehbbs.gwinnett.com (Curt Tucker) writes:
- > randle@nosc.mil (Mike Randle) writes:
- > +
- > +I Recall reading about a medical mishap back in the late 70s (I think).
- > +A doctor slipped up during a circumcision of a bouncing baby boy, and
- > +recommended to the parents that he should have a sex change operation
- > +and be rasied as a girl. Seems that the kid's fledgling manhood was
- > +beyond repair. If I'm right, the doctor was in the military, and the
- > +hospital may have been Trippler (Hawaii). Can anyone confirm this
- > +incident, or is this just another urban legend? If it is true, whatever
- > +became of him/her? What happened to the doctor?
- >
- >I don't know about the incident to which you refer, but this did
- >happen in a metro Atlanta hospital in the last two or three
- >years. The incident and the instantly-filed lawsuit were big
- >news in all the local media.
- >
- >As I recall, it was either a hardware problem or a bad setting on
- >the electric cauterization gizmo. Painful but true. There were
- >allegations that similar machines had malfunctioned around the
- >country.
-
- I hate to insert some *facts* into this newsgroup, but...
-
- The Washington Post , October 23, 1985
-
- Two infants in Georgia lost their penises in August when circumcision
- operations went awry.
-
- In Atlanta, two families have filed malpractice suits against the
- physicians, the hospital and Valley Labs of Boulder, Colo., maker of an
- electrical cauterizing device used to perform the operations.
-
- In one case, the parents claim that the "severe and progressive nature" of
- the baby's burn -- including the entire scrotum -- resulted in the need for a
- sex-change operation.
-
- "Baby Doe is now a female person who has been rendered sterile and
- completely
- incapable of reproduction, and who will require medical monitoring and
- hormonal
- therapy for the remainder of her life," the suit says.
-
- The second malpractice suit claims that 90 percent of the boy's penis was
- severely burned, causing the entire external shaft to fall off.
-
- In a third case in Sylvester, Ga., an out-of-court settlement recently
- awarded $5 million to the parents of an infant burn victim after a plastic
- surgeon testified that he reconstructed a miniature penis for an infant who
- was
- severely deformed by circumcision several years ago.
-
- Subsequent to those suits, Atlanta's Northside Hospital has banned the
- electric cautery instrument that was used.
-
- Most circumcisions are still done with surgical knives, experts say.
-
- "Electric cautery devices were used in a few cases with bad results.
- They're
- not a medically acceptable way to do circumcisions, " says Dr. Joseph
- Greensher, a pediatrician and chairman of the the American Academy of
- Pediatrics
- accident and poison prevention committee.
-
- Ted "always use a mohel" Frank
- --
- ted frank | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu
- standard disclaimers | void where prohibited
- the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
-