home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!wam.umd.edu!rsrodger
- From: rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari)
- Subject: Re: Boycotts (was Re: Why are many low-income women fat?)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.002752.11831@wam.umd.edu>
- Sender: usenet@wam.umd.edu (USENET News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rac1.wam.umd.edu
- Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
- References: <C0194t.pA@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec30.003804.16597@wam.umd.edu> <C0302E.5ox@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 00:27:52 GMT
- Lines: 166
-
- In article <C0302E.5ox@news.cso.uiuc.edu> levine@symcom.math.uiuc.edu (Lenore Levine) writes:
- >rsrodger@wam.umd.edu (Yamanari) writes:
- >
- >>>(About judging other cultures by 20th-century standards.)
- >
- >> 1.5 page rant on culture judging deleted. Those who are going to
- >> email flame me willbe bounced unlessthey go back and read the thread.
- >
- >>>Also, in particular, I note that people of different cultures
- >>>may not have had the scientific facts available to them that are
- >>>available today;
- >
- >> Fair. However, everyone in the US has plenty of access
- >> to scientific material if not training, and yet you
- >> see morons pushing creationism in Louisiana.
- >
- >I was talking about past cultures, and tribal cultures in which
- >people have no access to formal education.
-
-
- OK.
-
-
- >> My point is, "Social justice" is redundant. Justice is
- >> the word people are looking for when they talk about
- >> "social justice".
- >
- >>>> Please define.
- >>>
- >>>I can't. I am not even sure that one rigid definition would always
- >>>be appropriate.
- >
- >> How do these differe from what you mean when you say "social
- >> justice"?
- >
- >I don't believe that good can be given a rigid definition, that
- >works in *all* circumstances (see a previous posting).
-
-
- In other words, you can't define it any better than I can because
- it's an empty term used to sound good.
-
-
- >>>> I have a very *clear* concept of right and wrong. It is not
- >>>> muddled by goofy social ideals. For me, right and wrong are
- >>>> black and right--there can be no "almost right" because that
- >>>> almost certainly implies that there were ulterior motives,
- >>>> and I consider motivation a prime factor in determining
- >>>> right and wrong.
- >>>
- >>>If you do consider motivation a prime factor, then please, use
- >>>respectful language to sincere posters. And *assume* people are
- >>>sincere until they give you *individual* evidence otherwise.
- >
- >> I always do.
- >
- >Was the "rant" above meant to apply to my writings, or to yours?
-
-
- Mine, of course. You could tell if you thought about what
- was obviously deleted--seeing as the immediately following
- quote was yours.
-
-
- >>>Some people are raped in situations which they should have been
- >>>able to know was dangerous;
- >
- >> Typical date rape.
- >
- >>>others in situations that they could
- >>>not imagine were dangerous.
- >
- >> Typical out of the shadow rape.
- >
- >...And some date rapes, too.
-
-
- Statistical anomaly.
-
-
- >> Which kind do people make more noise about?
- >
- >Is "noise" about rape wrong, if it in any way leads to the punishment
- >of rapists, or the prevention of rape?
-
-
- Noise that marks all men as rapists is certainly wrong.
- Noise that prevents men from serving as counselors in
- rape crisis centers is wrong. (Women who have justbeen
- attacked *NEED* exposure to kind, compassionate men.)
-
-
- >>>In any case, the "penalty" of being raped
- >>>is much higher now than it was a generation ago, because of AIDS.
- >
- >> Not all rape victims are exposed to AIDS.
- >
- >But all of them have to go through six months of fearing it.
-
-
- Fear or personal paranoia doesn't change the punishment.
- Suppose I am afraid of camera flashes. Someone breaks into
- my house and snaps a photo--do they deserve anythingmore
- than breaking and entering just because I have some flash-phobia?
-
-
- >>>And I don't think this "penalty" is appropriate, for, for example,
- >>>a 14-year-old girl (a true example). Much too much punishment for their crime!
- >
- >> Agreed. I find rape repulsive. One of the things I find
- >> equally repulsive is the way feminists are so unwilling to admit
- >> that women need to be self-responsible. Clothing, manner,
- >> where you go, alcohol and drugs, appearance--all of these
- >> things ARE factors in rape.
- >
- >No feminist is denying this.
-
-
- You could have fooled me. In fact, all of my womens studies
- classes denied this. Almost all of the posters on alt.sex
- (the date rape thread, like circumcision and "Does America
- say yes to Japan?", raises it's ugly head every 6 months or
- so).
-
- An honest response might have been, "Not all feminists
- are denying this"--because *most* are, in fact, denying it.
-
-
-
- >> Feminists can claim that old women
- >> and unattractive women get raped all they want--they make up
- >> such an insignificant part of the total number of rapes that you
- >> can easily explain those away as fetishism or severe mental
- >> illness.
- >
- >"Out of the shadow" rapists don't care that much about the physical
- >appearance of their victims (see "What Cops Know," a collection of
- >interviews with Chicago police by Connie Fletcher).
-
-
- Also note that I pointed out that, while this happens, it is
- by far the least common form of rape.
-
-
- >Note that "typical" out-of-the-shadow rapists have some severe
- >psychological problems. In particular, read the section in Fletcher's
- >book on the "power reassurance" rapist, the most common type.
-
-
- I tend to be skeptical of anyone who suggests that rape
- is strictly a power crime. If it was about power, they'd
- be beating their victims up and shitting on them, or something
- similiar. And yes, while this does happen in some infinitisimally
- small number of rapes (out of the shadow ones, mostly) it is
- hardly an example of what we are talking about when we talk
- about rape.
-
-
- >Lenore Levine
-
-
- --
- Blaming society for your problems is like blaming clouds for rain.
- --- Boycott == censorship == cowardice ---
- Do I even need to point out that my views do not represent
- those of my employer, institution or relations?
-