home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.feminism
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!payner
- From: payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne)
- Subject: Re: Violence
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.165058.4990@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Dec20.171803.22588@netcom.com> <michael.724959579@glia> <1992Dec21.180039.29508@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 16:50:58 GMT
- Lines: 37
-
- In article <1992Dec21.180039.29508@midway.uchicago.edu> mec6@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
- >michael@glia.biostr.washington.edu (Michael) writes:
- >>payner@netcom.com (Rich Payne) writes:
- >>>jean@cs.cornell.edu (Jean M. Petrosino) writes:
- >
- >>>> I think the men here have to stop
- >>>>directing their anger at feminists who call attention to violence issues,
- >>>>and re-direct their anger at the men who are committing these violent acts.
- >
- >>>Yes, when women are angry, their anger is valid. But when men voice their
- >>>anger, they are misdirected. This explains a lot.
- >
- >>That is not what she just said. But I suppose its easy to make fun of
- >>someone just after you stuff words in their mouth.
- >
- >Whaaaattt? *Rich*? Rich misconstrue something somebody said just so that
- >he could piss on it??????? Nooooo. Tell me it isn't so!
-
- And a Merry Christmas to you too rini. One of these days, you will have to
- actually back up one of your silly little claims. You may find this hard
- to believe, but rhetoric, no matter how prosaic, is not sufficient.
-
- And as for "misconstrue[ing] something somebody said just so that [s]he could
- piss on it", I'd say you do not give yourself anywhere near enough credit.
- In fact, you are in a state of denial when your postings are at issue.
-
- >rini
-
-
- Rich
-
- payner@netcom.com
-
-
- P.S. You forgot to call me a liar, next post will do fine. :^)
-
-
-