home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sun4nl!ittpub.nl!david
- From: david@ittpub.nl (David P. Morgan)
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.misc
- Subject: Re: UUCP-SMTP help request
- Message-ID: <1992Dec16.194747.67@ittpub.nl>
- Date: 16 Dec 92 19:47:47 WET+0100
- References: <1992Dec16.111419.21308@npal.rn.com>
- Organization: ITT Publitec R+D BV, Amsterdam
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Dec16.111419.21308@npal.rn.com>, sbrant@npal.rn.com writes:
- > I think the solution is to use the mail_rewrite rules to intercept
- > all outbound-to addresses and to insert the routing info forcing
- > the message to go to the router system. I have attempted to do this
- > and it does modify the b.xxx file and the d.xxx file remains ok with
- > the proper @ address and uucp likes this. But I am not certain if this
- > really works, or is the correct method.
-
- I'm running UUCP v1.3 and that's exactly what I do so that people can enter
- Internet addresses in UUCP%"" and use the REPLY command.
- And it's always worked 100%.
-
- Also, you can put in a line that starts with the name "smart-host" in your
- U.whatever file equated to the router name and UUCP will send all messages
- it cannot route to the router. But I haven't neede to do this as the first
- message has always worked a treat. It's documented.
-
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- David P. Morgan Internet: david@ittpub.nl |ucannot
- ITT Publitec R+D BV UUCP: ...!sun4nl!ittpub!david|readdis
- Amsterdam PSI: 020412905761212::DAVID |onaVT52
-