home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!hellgate.utah.edu!lanl!beta.lanl.gov!u108502
- From: u108502@beta.lanl.gov (Andrew Poutiatine)
- Subject: Re: Richard P. Feynman
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.172120.18732@newshost.lanl.gov>
- Sender: news@newshost.lanl.gov
- Organization: Los Alamos National Laboratory
- References: <R0RkVB1w165w@sys6626.bison.mb.ca> <schumach.724117382@convex.convex.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 17:21:20 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <schumach.724117382@convex.convex.com> schumach@convex.com (Richard A. Schumacher) writes:
- >>but I was. I don't see why I can't enjoy (and understand) both Hannah
- >>Arendt and Oppenheimer or Feynman. Please recall that Mr. Feynman
- >>specialized in physics but also painted and played the bongos, among many
- >>other endeavours not normally associated with 'scientists'.
- >
- >Not true!. Many scientists are interested in and appreciative of the arts.
- >You must be thinking of engineers.
- >
- >
- >
-
- At this point I feel I must remind you that engineering is by definition
- a blending of science and art. ;^)
-
- (much liberty taken in my definitions.... :^) )
-
- -AIP
- >
- >
-
-
-