home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.iastate.edu!pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu!abian
- From: abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian)
- Subject: TIME HAS INERTIA. (A3) ANSWERS THE FUNDAMENTAL QUESTIONS
- Message-ID: <abian.724213885@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Summary: Att: I. SINHA, G. NEIL, G.CAIN, C. JONES, L. CRANSWICK
- Keywords: (A3), (A1), SECURITY, TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO
- Sender: news@news.iastate.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Iowa State University, Ames IA
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 02:31:25 GMT
- Lines: 214
-
-
- To the Readers of TIME HAS INERTIA
- THE CORNERSTONE OF MODERN PHYSICS: (A3)
-
- There were many, many e-mail requests to repost ABIAN's Principles
- (A1) to (A4) and their significance. I will indulge.
-
- Please save this posting and please help me in communicating them
- to people who will request again - I cannot respond to everyone,
- although I deeply appreciate their interest. I receive requests
- from Russia, from China, from Japan, from South Africa, from Arabia,
- from Australia, from Canada, from France, from Germany, from Spain, etc.
-
-
- (A1) says that the action of every object be it a particle, a planet,
- a galaxy, a person, a nation, a bacteria, a virus, ... is governed by
-
- (A1) THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO, REACTION TO PROVO-
- CATION AND THE TENDENCY OF MAINTAINING AGAIN A STATUS QUO
-
- Based on (A1), I derived (I have repeated this several time):
-
- (A2) TIME HAS INERTIA (i.e. TIME IS MATTER) AND SOME ENERGY IS DIS-
- SIPATED IRRETRIEVABLY FOR MOVING TIME FORWARD
-
- (thus, the principle of Conservation of Energy must be rejected)
-
-
- From a penultimately basic, elemental and primal point of view, (A1)
- can be explained by (A3):
-
- (A3) says that the action of every object be it a particle, a planet,
- a galaxy, a person, a nation, a bacteria, a virus, ... is governed by
-
-
- (A3) TO GAIN A FEELING OF SECURITY
-
-
- (A3) is the penultimate. I cannot define "SECURITY" it is the penultimate
- basic notion. I can describe it, feel it; subconsciously and consciously
- recognize it - but define it in terms of any other notions - No!
-
- (A3) is it. It is the DNA of creation. In fact, in accordance
- with (A3), my principle (A4) says:
-
- (A4) LIFE IS AN INEXORABLE AND RELENTLESS PROCESS OF DOING EVERYTHING
- IN ORDER TO GAIN A FEELING OF SECURITY
-
- Every electron, every molecule, every object, every compound in a
- physics or chemistry laboratory, every piece of machinery every matter
- animate or, the so-called, inanimate acts according to (A3).
-
- The Science in general, and Physics in particular must accept (A3)
- or (A1) and stop rejecting the notion that inanimate objects do not crave
- like animate object to GAIN A FEELING OF SECURITY.
-
- There is no sharp demarkation line between animate or inanimate
- objects. There is one and only one basic thing, i.e., MATTER the rest
- are various configurations and collections of matter.
-
- We are made of molecules the same way that a stone is made of mole-
- cules.
- People more actively exhibit animation, a stone much much more passively.
- Even among people the degree of animation or vivacity varies.
-
- I MAINTAIN THAT ACCEPTANCE OF (A3) AS WELL AS REJECTION OF (A3) ARE
- BOTH GOVERNED BY (A3).
-
- Physicists who reject (A3), they reject it because they are fanatically
- maintaining their indoctrination as to what Physics and Science is. THEY
- REJECT (A3) BECAUSE THEIR REJECTION OF (A3) MAKES THEM FEEL SECURE.
-
- Physicists who accept (and believe me there are some - and their number
- is growing) (A3), they accept it because the explanation of some phenomena
- by invoking (A3) is much more convincing and rational. THEY ACCEPT (A3)
- BECAUSE THEIR ACCEPTANCE OF (A3) MAKES THEM FEEL SECURE
-
- I observe that
-
- (A3) IS SO POWERFUL THAT IT EXPLAINS BOTH ACCEPTANCE AND REJECTION
- OF (A3)
-
- The above circumstance enrages, infuriates, irritates, PROVOKES and
- inflames the majority of physicists. Their reaction (which apparently
- gives them a feeling of security) is to say
-
- Abian, you are insane, your Principle (A3) is a useless incoherent
- babble, meaningless garbage, beta-sigma, balderdash, nonsense, non-
- scientific hallucination and alienation of mind. They repeatedly
- say, Abian, (A3) is tantamount to saying
-
- EVERYTHING ACTS THE WAY IT ACTS BECAUSE GAGA IS GAGA
-
- They say, Abian your (A3) gives as much information as does
-
- GAGA IS GAGA
-
- My reply is, Oh, yes ? Listen to me you neanderthalish minds:
-
- During the World War 2, when Germans with lightning speed at-
- tacked and invaded France,
-
- GENERAL PETAIN OF FRANCE SAID:
-
- FOR THE SECURITY OF OUR FRENCH NATION LET US NOT FIGHT THE
- ENEMY AND LET US COEXIST, LET US DILUTE THE INTRUDER !
-
- On the other hand, from England
-
- GENERAL DE GAULLE SAID:
-
- FOR THE SECURITY OF OUR FRENCH NATION LET US FIGHT THE ENEMY TO
- DEATH
-
- Observe both Generals, one FOR NOT FIGHTING and the other FOR FIGHTING
- invoked my momentous (and I am being very modest) PRINCIPLE (A3), i.e.,
-
- FOR THE SECURITY OF OUR FRENCH NATION, i.e., they invoked (A3)
-
- Observe that they did not say:
-
- LET US FIGHT OR NOT FIGHT SINCE GAGA IS GAGA !
-
- So, you see that (A3) was used both for accepting and rejecting the
- FIGHTING and this in a most dramatic life-and death situation.
-
- Same thing, when London was being bombarded savagely, Churchill said
-
- WE HAVE TO FIGHT BACK FOR THE SECURITY OF OUR NATION
-
- observe that Churchill did not say
-
- WE HAVE TO FIGHT SINCE GAGA IS GAGA
-
- Same things happen at particle level. Particles take various paths,
- various ways to FEEL SECURE. Some particles go in one direction, follow
- a certain path whereas the others go to an opposite or some other direction.
- BUT BOTH ARE MOTIVATED WITH THE SAME FUNDAMENTAL, BASIC, INGENIOUS,
- OF BREATH-TAKING INTELLIGENCE THE GREATEST PRINCIPLE IN THE ANNALS OF
- HUMAN CIVILIZATION MY (A3)!.
-
- So, I hope some physicists who with desperate craving for security
- still are clinging to their status quo of not admitting (A3) as the most
- fundamental Physical Law, abandon their irrational clinging to out-
- dated, decaying laws of St. Newton and St. Einstein and St. Maxwell, and
- shake these items from the body of their knowledge and listen to me,
- adopt my views and follow my teachings and principles.
-
- By the way, I may even go further and be more realistic and say:
-
- THE GENERALS PETAIN, De GAULLE, as WELL as CHURCHILL really meant:
-
- Do this or that because it makes me (i.e., Petain, De Gaulle
- and Churchill) feel secure !
-
- Now, to give a physics experiment.
-
- A drop of ink is dropped into a glass of water. The INC is
- an intruder, water is weak. For its own feeling of security
- (Like General Petain) water dilutes the intruder - Water feels much
- more secure by diluting the intruder
-
- Ask a physicist the question "Why water dilutes a drop of the ink"
- His/her first answer most probably will be "ask a chemist". You go and ask
- the chemist, his /her first answer most probably will be "ask a physi-
- cist". Finally after giving you the usual run around someone will
- tell you "Oh, it is exchange of energies , physical to chemical,
- thermal to both physical and chemical, and chemical to both physical
- and thermal "
- None, will tell you "Water Dilutes an intruding drop of ink because
- diluting the intruder (like in General Petain's case) makes water
- feel secure " None will tell you this. In fact if you tell them
- that Abian said so - they will have a conniption fit and will throw
- you out of their office and report you to the authorities to commit
- you into the nearest insane asylum (this will make them feel secure)
-
- On the other hand, the sulfuric acid is powerful enough to create
- enough heat to evaporate the intruding drop of water. To keep its
- concentration of acidity is what makes sulfuric acid feel secure.
-
- I can give you examples pertaining to attraction, repulsion of
- masses and charges all based convincingly on (A3). DO NOT FORGET
- THAT THE SPACE, YES THE SPACE ALSO DESPERATELY TENDS TO MAINTAIN
- ITS TOTAL NEUTRALITY.
-
- RADIOACTIVITY IS NOTHING ELSE THAN SPACE'S DILUTING THE
- RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL -to feel secure, Just as General
- Petain was diluting the intruder, just as water was diluting
- the intruding drop of the ink.
-
- TO MAINTAIN ITS NEUTRALITY SPACES DELUTES A GRAT DEAL OF MATTER. DO
- NOT FORGET THIS. SPACE DILUTES A GREAT DEAL OF MATTER TO MAINTAIN ITS
- NEUTRALITY AND THIS MAKES SPACE FEEL SECURE !
-
-
- TIME HAS INERTIA IS BECOMING ACCEPTED. THIS NOBEL-PRIZE WINNING
- ASSERTION WILL SAVE YOU PHYSICISTS FROM FALSE SECURITY FEELING THAT
- YOU MAINTAIN IN CLINGING TO the PARANOID EXPLANATIONS ABOUT
- 4, 5, 6, 7, dimensional semi-differentiable manifold as
- description of the Cosmos. The time to abandon these pre-
- cambrian mentality is right now. I give you the REAL TRUTH,
- FOLLOW ME, ACCEPT MY IDEAS, DEVELOP THEM DON'T WASTE YOUR
- TIME IN HYPOCRITICAL SLAVISH BLIND ACCEPTANCE OF DECADENT
- PRINCIPLES OF CURRENT INDOCTRINATIONS OF PHYSICS.
-
- I am exhausted.
- With love Alexander Abian
-
-
- --
- The tendency of maintaining the status-quo, Reaction to provocation and
- The tendency of maintaining again a status-quo.
- TIME HAS INERTIA and some energy is lost to move Time forward
- E = mcc (Einstein) must be replaced by E = m(0) exp(-At) (Abian)
-