home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!beckman.com!dn66!a_rubin
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - NewScientist Article
- Message-ID: <a_rubin.724445334@dn66>
- From: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin)
- Date: 15 Dec 92 18:48:54 GMT
- References: <1992Dec11.024139.12143@dmp.csiro.au>
- <1992Dec12.195654.7419@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- <1992Dec14.023025.20353@dmp.csiro.au> <1992Dec14.055311.10343@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Dec15.060749.3517@coplex.com>
- Organization: Beckman Instruments, Inc.
- Nntp-Posting-Host: dn66.dse.beckman.com
- Lines: 18
-
- In <1992Dec15.060749.3517@coplex.com> chuck@coplex.com (Chuck Sites) writes:
-
- >crb7q@kelvin.seas.Virginia.EDU (Cameron Randale Bass) writes:
-
- >There may be a test of this theory, alabet a tricky one. A friend of mine
- >asked the following question: If a neutrino has no mass, then it should
- >not be effected by gravity.
-
- I don't think so in the standard theories; if Wegener's theory states that,
- then it is testable.
-
-
-
- --
- Arthur L. Rubin: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (work) Beckman Instruments/Brea
- 216-5888@mcimail.com 70707.453@compuserve.com arthur@pnet01.cts.com (personal)
- My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of my employer.
- My interaction with our news system is unstable; please mail anything important.
-