home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16962 sci.philosophy.tech:4569
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!qmw-dcs!arodgers
- From: arodgers@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Angus H Rodgers)
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.philosophy.tech
- Subject: Re: Numbers and sets
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.181158.20940@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>
- Date: 15 Dec 92 18:11:58 GMT
- References: <1992Dec12.223409.18446@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Dec13.181447.354@guinness.idbsu.edu> <1992Dec13.162120.18457@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Dec14.162438.15591@guinness.idbsu.edu>
- Sender: usenet@dcs.qmw.ac.uk (Usenet News System)
- Organization: Computer Science Dept, QMW, University of London
- Lines: 11
- Nntp-Posting-Host: theoryc.dcs.qmw.ac.uk
-
- >>>>>>>>Is the cardinal interpretation or the ordinal interpretation more
- >>>>>>>>"natural"? Which can be more easily understood? Which is more
- >>>>>>>>suitable to the appropriate extensions? These questions are non-
- >>>>>>>>trivial.
-
- How many `>' signs are there in that set? (This question is non-trivial.) :-)
- --
- Gus Rodgers, Dept. of Computer Science, |
- Queen Mary & Westfield College, Mile End |
- Road, London, England. +44 71 975 5241 |
- E-mail (JANET): arodgers@dcs.qmw.ac.uk | Post in haste, repent at leisure.
-