home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:16801 sci.physics:21030 sci.bio:4546 sci.chem:5376 misc.education:5205
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics,sci.bio,sci.chem,misc.education
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!skule.ecf!torn!news.ccs.queensu.ca!polowin
- From: polowin@chem.queensu.ca (Joel Polowin)
- Subject: Re: TIME HAS INERTIA - BASS JEALOUS AND INSECURE-ABIAN VALIDATED
- Message-ID: <Bz7rtx.F77@knot.ccs.queensu.ca>
- Sender: news@knot.ccs.queensu.ca (Netnews control)
- Organization: Dept. of Chemistry, Queen's University
- References: <1992Dec12.195654.7419@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <12-12-92> <abian.724200923@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu>
- Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 20:05:56 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <abian.724200923@pv343f.vincent.iastate.edu> abian@iastate.edu (Alexander Abian) writes:
-
- > DO NOT ASK what is the Definition of "SECURITY" - nothing can define it
- >-it is the basic, the fundamentally elemental term
- >
- > IT IS THE LIFE ITSELF, IT IS THE SCIENCE, THE PHYSICS ITSELF
-
- Great. Sounds like the Force. Straight from the mouth of Abian Kenobi.
-
- Abian, you have made a specific prediction, based on your theory: that
- particles are unstable, inversely proportional to how "big" they are.
- I don't know how you define "big", but I can't think of any definition
- which doesn't place mesons, with very short lifetimes, between electrons
- and protons, which don't. Your specific prediction contradicts tremendous
- numbers of replicated, reliable experiments. The usual conclusion that is
- drawn from such results is that your theory is incorrect.
-
- Joel Polowin
- polowin@silicon.chem.queensu.ca, polowin@chem.queensu.ca,
- polowinj@qucdn.queensu.ca
-
-