home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!kepler1!andrew
- From: andrew@rentec.com (Andrew Mullhaupt)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: Alleged shortage of mathematicians (was Re: M
- Message-ID: <1407@kepler1.rentec.com>
- Date: 10 Dec 92 23:40:02 GMT
- References: <1992Dec7.093923.18235@husc3.harvard.edu> <1401@kepler1.rentec.com> <Byzw0x.MCv@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
- Organization: Renaissance Technologies Corp., Setauket, NY.
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <Byzw0x.MCv@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> hrubin@pop.stat.purdue.edu (Herman Rubin) writes:
- >In article <1401@kepler1.rentec.com> andrew@rentec.com (Andrew Mullhaupt) writes:
- >> The question
- >>as I see it is "should a Ph. D. limit himself to employment as a pure
- >>mathematics research professor?"
-
- >Did you mean "ought not" instead?
-
- I have no problem with that wording. But I don't see a big difference.
-
- >But I agree that few should limit
- >themselves to pure mathematics research; they should get involve, on
- >a part-time basis, with applications. Conversely, those doing applications
- >should get involved with teaching and supervising PhD research. Even if
- >this is not done, the applied people should keep their hands in the
- >"pure stuff." Both the theory and applications suffer from the separation.
-
- Absolutely. One of the important ways to stay sharp as an applied mathematician
- is to continue to study pure math.
-
- In fact I think one of the most important developments in mathematics is
- the growing realization on the part of the mathematical community that
- 'pure' mathematics is not separated from applied mathemtics by some
- fortified border, but is really an adjective for things we don't know
- how to use yet.
-
- Later,
- Andrew Mullhaupt
-