home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!acorn!eoe!pwestlak
- From: pwestlak@eoe.co.uk (Peter Westlake)
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Subject: Liar paradox
- Message-ID: <1476@eouk13.eoe.co.uk>
- Date: 16 Dec 92 18:16:54 GMT
- Organization: EO Europe Limited, Cambridge, UK
- Lines: 22
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
-
-
- Please forgive me if this is a naive question (or even completely stupid :-)
-
- The way I have heard the original Cretan liar paradox expressed is that
- Epiminedes, a Cretan, said "All Cretans are liars". The reasoning goes that
- as Epiminedes is known to be from Crete, he therefore claims to be a liar,
- and therefore claims not to be, which is a paradox. But it seems to me
- (in my ignorance) that this statement permits a consistent interpretation,
- namely that SOME Cretans are liars, and that Epiminedes is one of them.
- By supposing the existence of other Cretans, we avoid a paradox.
-
- So a) I have the original statement wrong
- or b) it never was a paradox really
- or c) I have missed something obvious and everything I say is false.
- Break it to me gently, especially if I have misspelled "Epi.*".
-
- Peter.
- --
- Peter M Westlake EO Computer Ltd.,
- Tel: +223-843131 Abberley House, Granhams Road,
- Fax: +223-843032 Great Shelford,
- email: pwestlak@eoe.co.uk Cambridge CB2 5LQ, England
-