home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!spool.mu.edu!agate!curtis
- From: curtis@cs.berkeley.edu (Curtis Yarvin)
- Newsgroups: misc.writing
- Subject: Re: support for the arts in the US
- Date: 14 Dec 1992 18:46:30 GMT
- Organization: UC Berkeley CS Dept.
- Lines: 23
- Message-ID: <1gikq6INNra5@agate.berkeley.edu>
- References: <tg9dhtk@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1gdaaqINN1kg@agate.berkeley.edu> <1992Dec14.144232.21162@syma.sussex.ac.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cobra.cs.berkeley.edu
-
- In article <1992Dec14.144232.21162@syma.sussex.ac.uk> mapd1@syma.sussex.ac.uk (Nigel Ling) writes:
- >>
- >>If you want poor people to be able to read, you should give
- >>them money - not libraries.
- >
- >Heaven help us! Well, I may say this for you: you're probably in
- >tune with a few government officials these days, but not, I hope,
- >the majority of people.
-
- This debate has strayed rather too far afield from writing, and I
- think we should end it, but I can't resist explaining myself here.
-
- When you spend X dollars on libraries for the poor, instead of giving
- the poor X dollars, what you are saying is:
-
- "You do not have enough money to spend on things you need, but we do not
- trust you to decide what things you need. Therefore, instead of giving you
- money, which you would not spend wisely, we will give you what we think
- is best for you."
-
- If you approve of this attitude, probably the less said the better.
-
- c
-