home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: misc.consumers
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!doug.cae.wisc.edu!kolstad
- From: kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad)
- Subject: Re: Tell me about electric blankets
- Organization: U of Wisconsin-Madison College of Engineering
- Distribution: na
- Date: 14 Dec 92 10:55:44 CST
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.105544.10002@doug.cae.wisc.edu>
- References: <1992Dec13.193548.13750@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <1992Dec14.092120.20097@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <1992Dec14.092120.20097@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com> billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson) writes:
- >kolstad@cae.wisc.edu (Joel Kolstad) writes:
- >:
- >: Your DC blanket will, of course, generate a magnetic field -- just not an
- >: electric one. Whether or not this is better or worse from the health
- >: standpoint is, as you point out, a good question.
- >
- >Bullshit. It will produce a DC electromagnet field. That field will build
- >and collapse as the blanket thermostat cycles.
-
- Um, Bill, for someone who works for a very reputable company on the net
- here, I'm surprised you'd use such language.
-
- If you're thinking of blankets that just have an on/off cycle, there will
- only be a significant electric field during the moment that the switch does
- cycle. There may be small fields due to the change in resistivity of the
- blanket while it's on, but for the most part _only_ an magnetic field is
- generated.
-
- If you have a blanket that switches on and off every, say, 15 minutes, the
- e-field exposure is going to be pretty insignificant compared to a 60Hz AC
- electric blanket. Consider also that even the electric field generated
- when a switching does occur will have a very small frequency component at
- 60Hz (since the change in the current will be approximately a square wave
- of fundamental frequency 1/(15 min*60 s/min)=1/900 Hz).
-
- Finally, the concept of a "DC electromagnetic field" is of dubious value
- at best. When someone says "EM field" the implication is that the two
- fields are linked together from one common source, as is the case in AC.
- That link is, for almost all pruposes, non-existant in this quasi-static
- case.
-
- If you like, I can drudge out Maxwell's equations and show this all
- mathematically, but I don't think there's much point.
-
- ---Joel Kolstad
-
- P.S. -- Which division of HP do you work for? Certainly not one where
- they do anything with fields and waves?
-