home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!sgigate!sgi!cdp!cberlet
- From: cberlet@igc.apc.org (NLG Civil Liberties Committee)
- Newsgroups: misc.activism.progressive
- Subject: Re: Wise Use in Northeast (anti-Green)
- Message-ID: <1425500038@igc.apc.org>
- Date: 13 Dec 92 22:24:00 GMT
- References: <1425500034@igc.apc.org>
- Sender: Notesfile to Usenet Gateway <notes@igc.apc.org>
- Lines: 138
- Approved: map@pencil.cs.missouri.edu
- Nf-ID: #R:cdp:1425500034:cdp:1425500038:000:5657
- Nf-From: cdp.UUCP!cberlet Dec 13 14:24:00 1992
-
-
- /* Written 2:14 pm Dec 13, 1992 by cberlet in igc:publiceye */
- The Scent of Opportunity:
- A Survey of the Wise Use/Property Rights
- Movement in New England
-
- by William Kevin Burke
-
- December 12, 1992
-
- The Big North
-
-
- Regionally, the New England Wise Use/property
- rights movement has been most active and vocal on
- issues surrounding the forested lands known as
- the Big North. And the fate of the Big North, 30
- million acres of woods that stretch across four
- states, will determine the economic future of
- northern New England. Covering most of Maine, the
- Northern portions of Vermont and New Hampshire,
- and the top third of New York, the mixed
- woodlands of the Big North have been managed
- according to a tradition of cooperation between
- industrial and public uses. Large acreages of
- Maine woods have been clearcut, but the
- willingness of forest products companies, which
- own one-third of the Big North outright, to leave
- their lands open for public use has helped
- sustain the state's tourist industries. This
- balance between public and private land use has
- been maintained despite the relative paucity of
- governmental land purchases. A few national and
- state parks dot the region, but Yankee
- independence (Governor Percival Baxter had to
- purchase the land for Maine's first state park
- with his own funds, then donate the land to the
- state) and forest industry noblesse oblige
- created a compromise system that met the region's
- economic needs and left the Big North relatively intact.
-
- Until recently, that is. In 1982 Sir James
- Goldsmith, a British corporate raider, bought
- Diamond International, makers of safety matches
- and owners of over one million acres of Big North
- forest land. Goldsmith made over 200 percent
- profit on his investment by breaking up Diamond
- and selling off the company's assets. Federal and
- state money obtained by Senator Rudman of New
- Hampshire allowed that state to purchase about
- forty-five thousand acres of former Diamond
- lands, but only after Goldsmith had first sold
- the land to a developer, who made a large profit
- by outbidding the state initially, then raising
- the price and reselling part of his acquisition
- to the state.
-
- Most of the Diamond lands were purchased by other
- forest products companies. But this experience
- showed the governments of the four Big North
- states that unless they organized to plan for
- future changes in land ownership, the Big North,
- which lies within a day's drive of 40 million
- Canadians and Americans, would gradually be
- subdivided into resort communities. This would
- mean more no trespassing signs and septic tanks
- surrounding woodland lakes, fewer forest products
- jobs, and more low-wage jobs for chambermaids and
- gas station attendants.
-
- The governors of the Big North states appointed a
- study group to investigate the possibilities for
- planning the future development and management of
- the Big North. This led to the formation of the
- Northern Forest Lands Council, a National Forest
- Service advisory body composed of
- environmentalists, forest industry
- representatives, and state and federal
- representatives, to continue this planning
- process. In the summer of 1991, New Hampshire,
- Vermont, and Maine held hearings on proposals to
- make the Council an independent body. It still
- would not have power to condemn or purchase
- private lands, but the new status would have
- meant the Council would no longer be dependent on
- the Forest Service for its existence.
-
- Those hearings marked the emergence of the Wise
- Use/property rights movement in upper New
- England. Activists from the Adirondacks and other
- areas arrived to speak against the Council in New
- England. The John Birch Society distributed
- flyers warning, "Land Takeover Threatens NY, VT,
- NH and ME." Environmentalists were surprised and
- somewhat overwhelmed by this opposition to a
- council painstakingly assembled so as to contain
- representatives of all points of view.
-
- In Maine, the Bangor City Hall, site of what had
- been expected to be a relatively
- non-controversial hearing, was cleared by
- authorities when about two hundred Wise Use
- activists disrupted the proceedings with chants.
- New hearings were scheduled a few months later
- for a larger hall. "Northern Forest Council
- Puke!" was the property rights activists'
- signature slogan displayed on signs at those
- hearings. Maine Governor Jack McKernan and later
- Senators Mitchell and Cohen, withdrew their
- support for upgrading the status of the Northern
- Forest Lands Council.
-
- Wise Use activists had employed misinformation,
- talking of land grabs and government plans to
- muzzle activist ministers, to orchestrate public
- fear and anger. Their antics damaged a program
- meant in no small part to allow dialogue between
- the forest products industry and the
- environmental community. Such dialogue is
- considered especially important by those
- concerned for the future of the region's forests
- as economic pressures cause an increase in
- clearcutting in the region.
-
- Environmentalists in both Maine and Vermont
- commented that since those hearings, their
- traditionally cooperative relationships with
- forest products companies have grown more
- distant. There is a perception that the forest
- industry, which could profit greatly by selling
- off select portions of the Big North for
- development and relying more on their southern
- and western lands for raw materials, has adopted
- a wait and see attitude, sending representatives
- to Wise Use gatherings but not publicly allying
- themselves to the more extreme ideologues who
- warn of creeping socialism and tyranny through
- land use planning.
-