home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: clausb@hpbbrd.bbn.hp.com (Claus Brod)
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 10:39:12 GMT
- Subject: Re: Multi-tasking
- Message-ID: <BzI5LD.Cy9@hpbbrd.bbn.hp.com>
- Organization: HP Mechanical Design Division
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!news.dtc.hp.com!hpscit.sc.hp.com!hplextra!hpcc05!hpbbn!hpbbrd!clausb
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
- References: <1gs7u7EINN4e2@uni-erlangen.de>
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1.8 PL6]
- Lines: 17
-
- Harald Schoenfeld (mppi76@cd4680fs.rrze.uni-erlangen.de) wrote:
- > It's true, MultiTOS is slow on STs. But we developed (!) programs on
- > the ST using MultiTOS. So it is not too slow. (It is faster than
- > Windows on a 386SX I think).
-
- I also use MiNT/MTOS on my standard Mega, and in the end it
- pays in terms of development speed because you can let the computer
- do things in the background while you're working in your editor.
- Moreover, it would be just horrible for me to be forced to use a more or
- less radically different set-up when switching from my TT to the Mega.
- Eric, if you are reading this: This is a definite vote for the general
- availability of MultiTOS.
-
- --
- --clausb@hpbeo79.bbn.hp.com----------------------------------------------
- Claus Brod, MDD, HP Boeblingen Things. Take. Time. (Piet Hein)
- --#include <std_disclaimer>----------------------------------------------
-