home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.amiga.misc:18690 comp.sys.mac.misc:20756 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:15907
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,comp.sys.atari.st.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!navajo!shulick
- From: shulick@navajo.ucs.indiana.edu (Sam Hulick)
- Subject: Re: WANTED: Your comments on Supra modems
- Message-ID: <BzE2pn.Bw1@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: navajo.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Vallen Software
- References: <7151@sersun1.essex.ac.uk> <1992Dec16.232239.581@sbcs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 05:46:35 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Dec16.232239.581@sbcs.sunysb.edu>, supra@xamiga.linet.org says most sayishly:
- >
- > If anyone has some interesting stories on Supra modems to share,
- >please tell me. I am collecting bug reports and owner reports for the
- >SupraFAX 14.4 v.32bis modems. Also, I am starting a mailing list for
- >discussion on solving problems and relaying experiences with Supra modems.
-
- Hard as hell to set up. Weird problems w/ flow control and
- character-eating. I also had prblems w/ uploading. I could download w/
- MNP5 (19.2k baud) but I had to switch to 9600 baud to upload. Probably
- because fact #1: Hard as hell to set up.
-
- > I WOULD NOT RECOMMEND SUPRA MODEMS - IN MY OPINION THEY ARE NOT RELIABLE
-
- Agreed. Zyxel's V.32(bis/non-bis) modems are very nice.
-
- --
- // Amiga 3000 ___ \ Sam Hulick: shulick@indiana.edu (NeXTmail OK!)
- // 68030 25 MHz /__/\ \ My opinions wear combat boots. Or whatever.
- \\// OS 2.04 \__\/ / "Walk! Not bloody likely. I am going in a
- \/ / taxi." --George Bernard Shaw
-