home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.appletalk
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!ckd
- From: ckd@eff.org (Christopher Davis)
- Subject: Re: CAP over LocalTalk?
- In-Reply-To: mark@cad.gatech.edu's message of 16 Dec 1992 16:49:32 -0500
- Message-ID: <CKD.92Dec16173254@loiosh.eff.org>
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: loiosh.eff.org
- Organization: Electronic Frontier Foundation Tech Central
- References: <1go89cINNjbq@cae.cad.gatech.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 22:32:57 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- MR> == Mark Reed <mark@cad.gatech.edu>
-
- MR> P.S. I don't have any philosophical objection to switching to
- MR> EtherTalk, and our Macs have Ethernet cards, but they use them to talk
- MR> TCP/IP. I know that EtherTalk and IP will coexist happily on a single
- MR> Ethernet, but I have my doubts about MacTCP and EtherTalk sharing an
- MR> interface. I can't even get two MacTCP programs to share...
-
- EtherTalk and MacTCP share just fine 'round here (including on some very
- heavily used machines). And, yes, MacTCP programs know how to play nice
- between themselves as well...
- --
- Christopher K. Davis | ``Usenet seems to run much like the Kif (or,
- <ckd@eff.org> EFF #14 | for the TV generation, Klingon) high command.
- System Administrator, EFF | Whoever takes action and can be heard wins.''
- +1 617 864 0665 [CKD1] | --Peter da Silva <peter@ferranti.com>
-