home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!caen!uwm.edu!linac!att!mcdchg!laidbak!tellab5!vpnet!hb
- From: hb@vpnet.chi.il.us (hank barta)
- Subject: Re: serial communication question
- Message-ID: <1992Dec11.044042.26612@vpnet.chi.il.us>
- Organization: Vpnet - Free Usenet access
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
- References: <1992Dec10.053208.12307@ucselx.sdsu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1992 04:40:42 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- Legene (maxc0452@ucselx.sdsu.edu) wrote:
- : Can anyone tell me if OS/2 uses interrupt-driven serial
- : port buffering for COM1 & COM2? I can't find that particular
- : information anywhere, it seems.
-
- : Thanks.
-
- I believe it does. (Most any multitasker has to use interrupts or
- _considerable_ hardware buffering.) I also have a deeply held
- belief that it supports the 16550 buffered UARTs.
-
- "ADVANCED PROGRAMMING FOR OS/2" or something like that by Petzold
- (published by Microsoft) has some discussions of how 1.1,2
- work that will probably be applicable to 2.0.
-
- hank
-