home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!spool.mu.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!vexcel!copper!rvaniwaa
- From: rvaniwaa@copper.denver.colorado.edu (Ronald J. Vaniwaarden)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Growing os2sys.ini file
- Message-ID: <4668@copper.Denver.Colorado.EDU>
- Date: 14 Dec 92 02:03:55 GMT
- References: <1992Dec12.222506.13097@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Dec13.220103.25075@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
- Organization: University of Colorado at Denver
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Dec13.220103.25075@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> parry@yoyo.cc.monash.edu.au (Tom J Parry) writes:
- >Timothy F. Sipples (sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu) wrote:
- >
- >I wonder if the IBM version will do some more than the others? I am also
- >the victim of the multiple Handles entries and am a little nervous to
- >delete any of them even though the activehandles entry only points to one
- >of them. Hopefully the IBM version is clever enough to remove incorrect
- >entries as well as the dead space that the others do.
- >
- I have to admit that I passed by all of these messages about the growing
- ini files as mine were always sitting at 60k and 150k for os2.ini and
- os2sys.ini respectively. I recently noticed that I was running out of HD
- space and checked these files. The results: 165653 and 1010849 bytes
- respectively. I admit that this is not a huge problem since cpyini shrunk
- them down to pre-CSD size but it is still quite annoying. I hope that this
- is fixed with the next upgrade (2.1ish)
-
- --Ronald Van Iwaarden
-