In article <1992Dec11.154229.28083@inel.gov> jar@inel.gov (Jeffry A Rich) writes:
>OK, good enuf. Now, what is/are the advantages to using HPFS over FAT...assuming a drive partition of 80 Mb? I understand that by using HPFS, you have to dedicate 512Kb of ram to it. With only 8Mb of total ram, this will hurt! Would long file names justify this loss?
Have you read the OS/2 FAQ List advice in this area?
--
Timothy F. Sipples | Read the OS/2 FAQ List 2.0h, available from
sip1@ellis.uchicago.edu | 128.123.35.151, anonymous ftp, in /pub/os2/all/info
Dept. of Econ., Univ. | /faq, or from LISTSERV@BLEKUL11.BITNET (send "HELP")
of Chicago, 60637 | [Read the List, THEN post to ONE OS/2 newsgroup.]