home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.claremont.edu!news!jwinstea
- From: jwinstea@fenris.claremont.edu (Jim Winstead Jr.)
- Subject: Re: UFC-Crypt
- In-Reply-To: prv2d@fulton.seas.Virginia.EDU's message of Mon, 14 Dec 1992 05:43:09 GMT
- Message-ID: <JWINSTEA.92Dec15190013@fenris.claremont.edu>
- Sender: news@muddcs.claremont.edu (The News System)
- Organization: Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
- References: <1992Dec11.000248.12027@iitmax.iit.edu> <1992Dec13.164916.1759@gkminix.han.de>
- <1992Dec14.054309.10224@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Date: 16 Dec 92 03:00:12 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- In article <1992Dec14.054309.10224@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> prv2d@fulton.seas.Virginia.EDU (Peter Villadsen) writes:
-
- I recently ran the small test suite included with the ufc-crypt
- package and found that it ran slower than the native crypt. For
- my 386/25 (no math coprocessor), this was:
- crypt: 312.7 crypts/sec
- ufccrypt: 281.9 crypt/sec
-
- I am wondering why this is the case? Under the Sun and RS6000,
- the UFC-crypt ran much faster. I'm using 0.98pl4, gcc2.2.2d on a
- 386/25 with no math coprocessor. Thanks,
-
- Well, for one thing, UFC-crypt is the native crypt under Linux.
- Perhaps you were trying an older version when you grabbed your own to
- compile?
- --
- loveritablessencentipedependentalism+ Jim Winstead Jr. (CSci '95)
- andaterrificklengtherealityearguessy| Harvey Mudd College, WIBSTR
- mpathybridgenerationiceremonymphysic| jwinstea@jarthur.Claremont.EDU
- alendareadvertisexpresshothoughthend+ or jwinstea@fenris.Claremont.EDU
-