home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!data.nas.nasa.gov!jet
- From: jet@boxer.nas.nasa.gov (J. Eric Townsend)
- Subject: DoJ monitoring memo
- Sender: news@nas.nasa.gov (News Administrator)
- Organization: Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation, NASA Ames
- Date: 17 Dec 92 16:51:57
- Message-ID: <JET.92Dec17165157@boxer.nas.nasa.gov>
- Lines: 28
-
-
- Keep in mind, folks, that the DoJ sent that to *government* sites,
- concerning *federal* computers. According to the local security
- folks, several "intruders" have gotten out of charges by claiming that
- unannouned gov't keystroke monitoring (ala Stoll's lineprinters on
- incoming dialups) is equivalent to an unauthorized wiretap.
-
- Some folks here at NASA claim that the DoJ message also gives them
- blanket coverage with regards to individuals monitoring general system
- usage. ie: logging the amount of times xterm is executed w/o letting
- the user know what you're doing *could* be seen as an unauthorized
- wiretap. Yeesh.
-
- One last item -- the government can play by different rules than
- private businesses. If I, as an individual, hire someone to kill a
- non-US citizen threatening my life, it's a felony. If the government
- drafts me, and tells me to kill Canadians because they threaten my
- life, it's perfectly ok. Likewise, gov't policies on "appropriate use
- of computing facilities" have been interpreted by NASA to mean that:
- "Computer resources and electronic mail services are provided for
- official government use only, and personal use of such resources is
- against the law."
-
- When it comes to private businesses, your milage may vary.
- --
- J. Eric Townsend -- jet@nas.nasa.gov -- 415.604.4311
- '92 R100R, DoD# 0378, BMWMOA, AMA, ACLU, EFF, CPSR
- "HotHead Rules!"
-