home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #30 / NN_1992_30.iso / spool / comp / lang / cplus / 17847 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-12-11  |  962 b   |  23 lines
  1. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!microsoft!hexnut!jimad
  3. From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
  4. Subject: Re: Give me safe C++
  5. Message-ID: <1992Dec11.222709.7679@microsoft.com>
  6. Date: 11 Dec 92 22:27:09 GMT
  7. Organization: Microsoft Corporation
  8. References: <Byxv1o.4nB@fiu.edu> <9234501.15945@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <Bz2nDF.7B6@fiu.edu>
  9. Lines: 12
  10.  
  11. In article <Bz2nDF.7B6@fiu.edu> feathers@serss0 (Michael Feathers) writes:
  12. >In article <9234501.15945@mulga.cs.mu.OZ.AU> fjh@munta.cs.mu.OZ.AU (Fergus James HENDERSON) writes:
  13. >>feathers@serss0 (Michael Feathers) writes:
  14. >>
  15. >>>In article <1992Dec07.193214.13720@microsoft.com> jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock) DOESNT write:
  16. >>>
  17. >>>I have been thinking recently about whether it would be possible to design a 
  18. >>>C++-like language which abandons the pointer syntax, yet provides the full
  19. >>>functionality of pointers....
  20.  
  21. Not *my* words -- somewhere along the line this original thread has become
  22. misattributed.
  23.