home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!uwm.edu!lll-winken!telecom-request
- From: mmm@cup.portal.com
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
- Subject: Questions About Scanner Laws
- Message-ID: <telecom12.906.5@eecs.nwu.edu>
- Date: 15 Dec 92 01:00:51 GMT
- Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- Organization: TELECOM Digest
- Lines: 26
- Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu
- X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 12, Issue 906, Message 5 of 16
-
- Is it legal to own a scanner that can receive cellular phone
- frequencies? Is it legal to use one? Is it legal to modify a scanner
- to receive these frequencies?
-
- And ditto, with regard to cordless phones and baby monitors. Same
- questions about scanning these things.
-
-
- [Moderator's Note: If the scanner was made prior to the change in the
- law, then it is not illegal to own it or use it. It is illegal to
- listen to those frequencies, or in the event they are tuned accidentally
- to acknowledge any transmission overheard. It is now illegal to make a
- scanner which receives those frequencies. It is illegal to modify a
- scanner to recieve those frequencies. In other words, if you had a
- Radio Shack PRO-34 scanner and you pulled diodes D-3 and D-4 from the
- circuit, you would be breaking the law. I am reminded of the 'Radio
- Hobbyists Guild' which some fool here in Chicago operated a decade ago
- when Oak/Channel 44 was running scrambled pay television. He send out
- detailed schematics and copious notes to anyone who sent money to his
- post office box. These schematics and notes informed the reader exactly
- what NOT to do to avoid breaking any laws when building things which
- 'resembled' decoder boxes. (What's that, Pfieffer? Who, me? Blush!).
- During the 1920's, the Annheuser-Busch Brewing Company sent out kits
- for making your own near-beer ("be sure not to connect A to B or add
- any of ingredient C; that would be violating Prohibition ...") PAT]
-