home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!cc.ic.ac.uk!imperial.ac.uk!vulture
- From: vulture@imperial.ac.uk (Thomas Sippel - Dau)
- Subject: Re: question: escape + + + --> NO CARRIER
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.190752.23086@cc.ic.ac.uk>
- Sender: vulture@carrion.cc.ic.ac.uk (Thomas Sippel - Dau)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cscgc
- Reply-To: cmaae47@imperial.ac.uk
- Organization: Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
- References: <SOSC1103.92Dec14060515@wc07.yorku.ca>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 19:07:51 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <SOSC1103.92Dec14060515@wc07.yorku.ca>, sosc1103@wc07.yorku.ca (Ming He) writes:
- - When I use +++ to escape on line to command, I lost my carrier. This
- - command working well before. So I must do something wrong on setting.
- - Thus I need to know how to return to the factory setting (using 'AT'
- - command?).
-
- Welcome to the hazards of inband escapes signalling.
-
- When you typed + + +, the system you xere logged into probably echoed
- it back to you, thus escaping to command mode on both modems (the one you
- used ont hte way out, and the remote modem on the way back.
-
- Get in touch with the system manager on the q-end system and ask for the
- inband escape sequence to be disabled, by con figuring it with
-
- ATS1=128 or some such dodge
-
- Better still, do not use inband escape signallling at all.
-
- Thomas
-
- --
- *** This is the operative statement, all previous statements are inoperative.
- * email: cmaae47 @ ic.ac.uk (Thomas Sippel - Dau) (uk.ac.ic on Janet)
- * voice: +44 71 589 5111 x4937 or 4934 (day), or +44 71 823 9497 (fax)
- * snail: Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine
- * The Center for Computing Services, Kensington SW7 2BX, Great Britain
-