home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.cell-relay
- Path: sparky!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com!pjd.dev.cdx.mot.com!peterd
- From: peterd@pjd.dev.cdx.mot.com (Peter Desnoyers)
- Subject: Re: WDM and ATM
- Message-ID: <peterd.724525373@pjd.dev.cdx.mot.com>
- Sender: news@merlin.dev.cdx.mot.com (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: pjd.dev.cdx.mot.com
- Organization: Motorola Codex, Canton, Massachusetts
- References: <1992Dec14.221325.2405@trl.oz.au> <1992Dec16.053840.10120@atri.curtin.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 17:02:53 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- clarke@atri.curtin.edu.au (Nathan Clarke) writes:
-
- >This is true: WDM = Wavelength Division Multiplexing. But I'm not sure
- >why "ATM is fundamentally incompatible with the more promising WDM
- >switching mechanisms". WDM is an OSI layer 1 (physical layer)
- >multiplexing mechanism whereas ATM is at layer 2. WDM (I thought) is
- >used merely to mux multiple channels (bit streams) onto one optic
- >fibre. The channels themselves may/mayn't have undergone ATM
- >multiplexing; there should be no dependency.
-
- Actually, I should have referred to both wavelength division
- multiplexing with fast tunable receivers/transmitters and optical
- switching.
-
- Leaving the OSI model aside for a second, in both cases you have a
- technology that allows packets to be switched by logic whose speed is
- independent of the bitrate of the signal involved, and depends only on
- the overall packet rate. This can be taken advantage of by
- transmitting the header information at a lower bitrate, and possibly
- on a parallel channel or wavelength.
-
- However, any such mechanism is dependent on the ratio of header
- information to body information being low; this is not the case for
- ATM.
-
- Peter Desnoyers
- --
-