home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.databases.informix
- Path: sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!aburt
- From: aburt@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (Andrew Burt)
- Subject: Re: Suggested Changes to 4gl
- Message-ID: <1992Dec15.150508.8476@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
- References: <1992Dec14.215058.24334@netcom.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 15:05:08 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- In <1992Dec14.215058.24334@netcom.com> pmahler@netcom.com (Paul Mahler) writes:
-
- >Hello the net,
-
- >So far the only responses I have received have been suggestions
- >for changes to the input array statement. Is everyone really
- >this satisfied with 4gl? Is there nothing else we can
- >complain about?
-
- I have a two page list! I just haven't typed it in yet. (Something about
- project deadlines, etc...) I'll try to push it up in the queue on the off
- chance it might do some good.
-
- No, count me VERY disappointed with 4gl.
- --
-
- Andrew Burt aburt@du.edu
-
- "But if he was dying he wouldn't bother to carve "Aaaaargh", he'd just say it."
-