home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!cs.mu.OZ.AU!mrgreen
- From: mrgreen@mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (matthew green)
- Subject: leave the server alone (was: Re: yes or no? (bot deopping))
- Message-ID: <mrgreen.724297668@munagin>
- Sender: news@cs.mu.OZ.AU
- Organization: Computer Science, University of Melbourne, Australia
- References: <1g5lmrINNh0k@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <85220@ut-emx.uucp> <Bz7Lw3.IEq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> <1992Dec13.192502.3175@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 01:47:48 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- gl8f@fermi.clas.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl) writes:
-
- >In article <Bz7Lw3.IEq@news.cso.uiuc.edu> StarOwl@uiuc.edu writes:
-
- >>The /kick idea is interesting, but I'm not completely fond of it. An
- >>alternative (in the one chan-op scheme especially) would be to give /kick
- >>a few more teeth -- add an automatic ban as an after-effect of a kick.
-
- >This would be a great (and easy) feature to implement in a client.
- >Don't clutter the server.
-
- Wumpus is right. There has been too much talk of `new' things for the
- server lately, that would be easier, and better handled in a client.
- If you client doesn't do what you want, bad luck, go write your own,
- or modify an existing one, or hassle the maintainer.
-
- ..
-