home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!sol.deakin.OZ.AU!fulcrum.oz.au!steve
- From: steve@fulcrum.oz.au (Steve Taylor)
- Subject: Re: CERT and the Dept. of Justice on keystroke monitoring
- Message-ID: <1992Dec14.231010.513@fulcrum.oz.au>
- Organization: The Fulcrum Consulting Group
- References: <1992Dec10.025308.14768@nntp.hut.fi> <1992Dec10.094119.24516@netcom.com> <1992Dec10.163250.9286@news2.cis.umn.edu> <1992Dec10.175858.7486@netcom.com> <q50qgdg@dixie.com> <4200@wzv.win.tue.nl>
- Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1992 23:10:10 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- rob@wzv.win.tue.nl (Rob J. Nauta) writes:
- >jgd@dixie.com (John De Armond) writes:
- >>strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:
-
- >->The notion that people should be warned about monitoring, when it
- >->is done legally, is a fundamental civil liberties notion. It is
- >->in the same class as "fair warnings" of many other kinds.
-
- >>Damn straight. If Jerk-eeee doesn't want his keystrokes monitored, his
- >>option is to own his own machine. If he is a guest on someone else's machine
- >>or is on his employer's or institution's machine, he plays by their
- >>rules or does not play. Nothing difficult to understand about that.
-
- Lets see... If I rent a hotel room, does the hotel owner have the right to
- spy on me? After all, it's his hotel, and I could always go and buy my own
- house.
-
- Steve Taylor
-
-
-