home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: uno.cwis,alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!kadie
- From: kadie@eff.org (Carl M. Kadie)
- Subject: Re: Chain letters?
- Message-ID: <1992Dec12.015703.2844@eff.org>
- Originator: kadie@eff.org
- Sender: usenet@eff.org (NNTP News Poster)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: eff.org
- Organization: The Electronic Frontier Foundation
- References: <ed.724044684@cwis> <pschleck.724049200@cwis> <1992Dec11.165515.22434@eff.org> <cwis.724110716@cwis>
- Date: Sat, 12 Dec 1992 01:57:03 GMT
- Lines: 133
-
- cwis@cwis.unomaha.edu (Campus Wide Information Service) writes:
-
- [..]
- > Hi. Please allow me to introduce myself: I'm the bad guy in this
- >scenario (i.e. the system administrator).
- [...]
-
- That you are willing to discuss the policy in public suggests that
- you are not a bay guy.
-
- [...]
- >Mailing it to recipients one or twenty at a time is far less
- >efficient than posting it to a newsgroup and effecting site-wide (or
- >possibly world-wide) distribution. [...] Content aside, since the
- >distribution mechanism specifically chosen was far from the optimum
- >available, we are now looking at a resource abuse issue. The policy
- >on our campus (to which users here are required to agree before
- >obtaining an account) specifically prohibits resource abuse.
- [...]
-
- Did the joke chain letter actually cause a significant (or even
- noticeable) disruption? I would think that the joke chain letter's
- effects would be small compared to everyday e-mailing list traffic.
-
- >Further, the same policy prohibits non-academic use of the system.
- >We have been very generous to date with our interpretation of what
- >constitutes academic use;
-
- By one way of looking at it, you are being generious, but another you
- are censoring via selective enforcement (i.e. by prohibiting many
- things, but only enforcing the prohibition against the things you find
- offensive.)
-
- >if you can explain to me the academic purpose of that letter, I would
- >be very interested in hearing about it.
- [...]
-
- Freedom of expression is very academic. The Joint Statement on Rights
- and Freedoms of Students says:
-
- "Academic institutions exist for the
- transmission of knowledge, the pursuit of truth, the development
- of students, and the general well-being of society. Free inquiry
- and free expression are indispensable to the attainment of these
- goals."
-
- and (in the contect of inviting speakers to campus):
-
- "The institutional control of campus facilities should not
- be used as a device of censorship."
-
- - Carl
-
- ANNOTATED REFERENCES
-
- (All these documents are available on-line. Access information follows.)
-
- =================
- academic/student.freedoms.aaup
- =================
- * Student Freedoms (AAUP)
-
- Joint Statement on Rights and Freedoms of Students -- This is the main
- U.S. statement on student academic freedom.
-
- =================
- academic/speech-codes.aaup
- =================
- * Speech Codes (AAUP)
-
- On Freedom of Expression and Campus Speech Codes Expression - An
- official statement of the American Association of University
- Professors (AAUP)
-
- It says in part: "On a campus that is free and open, no idea can be
- banned or forbidden. No viewpoint or message may be deemed so hateful
- or disturbing that it may not be expressed."
-
- =================
- faq/censorship-and-harassment
- =================
- * Censorship And Harassment
-
- q: Must/should universities ban material that some find offensive
- (from Netnews facilities, email, libraries, and student publications,
- etc) in order to comply with antiharassment laws?
-
- a: No. The federal courts have said that harassing speech is different
- ...
-
- =================
- caf
- =================
- * About the CAF mailing lists (and newsgroups)
-
- A description of the comp-academic-freedom-talk mailing list. It is a
- free-forum for the discussion of questions such as: How should general
- principles of academic freedom (such as freedom of expression, freedom
- to read, due process, and privacy) be applied to university computers
- and networks? How are these principles actually being applied? How can
- the principles of academic freedom as applied to computers and
- networks be defended?
-
- =================
- =================
-
- If you have gopher, you can browse the CAF archive with the command
- gopher gopher.eff.org
-
- These document(s) are also available by anonymous ftp (the preferred
- method) and by email. To get the file(s) via ftp, do an anonymous ftp
- to ftp.eff.org (192.88.144.4), and get file(s):
-
- pub/academic/academic/student.freedoms.aaup
- pub/academic/academic/speech-codes.aaup
- pub/academic/faq/censorship-and-harassment
- pub/academic/caf
-
- To get the file(s) by email, send email to archive-server@eff.org.
- Include the line(s) (be sure to include the space before the file
- name):
-
- send acad-freedom/academic student.freedoms.aaup
- send acad-freedom/academic speech-codes.aaup
- send acad-freedom/faq censorship-and-harassment
- send acad-freedom caf
-
-
-
-
- --
- Carl Kadie -- I do not represent EFF; this is just me.
- =kadie@eff.org, kadie@cs.uiuc.edu =
-