home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
- Below is an error I got replying to a message I received. I realize why I got
- the error. In PMDF on our vax (DUKEMC) I have put in an alias for dryfo001 and
- pointed it to dryfo001@deneb.mc.duke.edu (my workstation).
-
- This has worked fine for some time. However, just found a case where it does
- not. Someone sent me mail from a Bitnet node (DUKEMVS) to dryfo001@dukemc. My
- alias forward sent it to me at deneb.mc.duke.edu, but the return address was
- setup so that it would only work we replying through the PMDF system (which it
- was not) -- i.e. user@node.bitnet. Normal SMTP internet mail works fine as my
- reply goes directly to the sender and not through PMDF. I suspect I need a
- rewrite rule or something to prevent this? Am I doing something I am not
- supposed to? On systems connected to the PMDF system, I want replies to go
- through our Bitnet connection, but for cirumstances such as this, we need to go
- through an SMTP/Bitnet gateway or back through the PMDF system?
-
- Thanks in advance,
-
- --Jim Dryfoos
-
- ---------- Forwarded message ----------
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 11:06:53 -0500
- From: MAILER-DAEMON@deneb.mc.duke.edu
- To: dryfo001@deneb.mc.duke.edu
- Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown
-
- ----- Transcript of session follows -----
- 550 dukemvs.bitnet (tcp)... 550 Host unknown
- 554 WEINER6@DUKEMVS.BITNET... 550 Host unknown (Authoritative answer from name server)
-
- ----- Unsent message follows -----
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 11:03:39 -0500 (EST)
- From: "James D. Dryfoos" <dryfo001>
- Subject: Re: BBS access
- To: WEINER6@DUKEMVS.BITNET
- In-Reply-To: <01GRBRVWRONI000088@mc.duke.edu>
- Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9211191138.E933-b100000@deneb.mc.duke.edu>
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
-
-
-
- On 19 Nov 1992 WEINER6@DUKEMVS.BITNET wrote:
-
- message deleted...
-
-