home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.space.shuttle:2812 sci.space:16228
- Newsgroups: sci.space.shuttle,sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Shuttle replacement
- Message-ID: <By32Ix.8Ju@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 20:35:20 GMT
- References: <1992Nov19.202302.5796@iti.org> <STEINLY.92Nov19135044@topaz.ucsc.edu> <1992Nov20.143407.21964@iti.org> <1992Nov20.155202.16554@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Nov20.201023.22268@ulysses.att.com>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov20.201023.22268@ulysses.att.com> smb@ulysses.att.com (Steven Bellovin) writes:
- >The question is whether or not there's enough profit to recoup that kind
- >of up-front development. In the space market, I sincerely doubt it,
- >unless the launch rate goes *way* up (see below)...
-
- Anybody considering sinking a bunch of cash into developing a much cheaper
- launcher is automatically assuming new markets, not existing ones. The
- existing markets aren't badly hampered by existing launch prices -- they
- shop for lowest price, sure, but they don't object to paying the going
- rate if it buys them things they care about, like reliability -- and are
- not going to respond to lower prices with great increases in volume.
-
- This is one of the bigger obstacles to novel launcher development: it's
- not enough to build the launcher, you also need to have the resources to
- hang in there while patiently nurturing a new market to use the new
- capabilities. If there was an assured market that you could point to,
- commercial launcher development would be underway all over the place.
- It's not an accident that the more farsighted schemes for encouraging
- commercial launchers focus on guaranteeing a market, not on providing
- direct support.
- --
- MS-DOS is the OS/360 of the 1980s. | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Hal W. Hardenbergh (1985)| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-