home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!tomk
- From: tomk@netcom.com (Thomas H. Kunich)
- Subject: Re: CNF bibliography update (total now 765 papers, 117 patents/appl.
- Message-ID: <1992Nov22.062238.10788@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
- References: <1992Nov20.010059.27510@netcom.com> <4iPJuB1w165w@netlink.cts.com> <1992Nov20.230343.20315@michael.apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 06:22:38 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Nov20.230343.20315@michael.apple.com> ems@michael.apple.com (E. Michael Smith) writes:
- >
- >Hmmm ... I'm not trained in this area at all, but the thought comes
- >to mind: IFF the theory is true, is there any isotope of alkali metal
- >that, when transformed per the theory, would produce a clearly identifiable
- >isotope of target material?
-
- IF he is fusioning calcium it is really simple to use a mass spectrometer
- to identify the isotope mix. A dead giveaway and necessary considering that
- even your breath probably contains enough calcium to contaminate the suh a
- finding.
-
-
-