home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.photo
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!ncar!noao!lytle
- From: lytle@noao.edu (Dyer Lytle CCS)
- Subject: Re: Camera Feature Wars - Photo Getting Like Video
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.180516.28628@noao.edu>
- Sender: news@noao.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gemini.tuc.noao.edu
- Organization: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, USA
- References: <13850@texsun.Central.Sun.COM> <2004@intermec.UUCP> <1992Nov20.162305.1@cc.helsinki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 18:05:16 GMT
- Lines: 84
-
-
-
- What fun! A posting thats not just about equipment!!! Go Mikko!
-
- (of course its not much about photography either but what the heck...)
-
-
-
- In article <1992Nov20.162305.1@cc.helsinki.fi> mlindholm@cc.helsinki.fi writes:
-
- >Our whole technological culture is based on the idea that everything must be
- >made to work ever more perfect. If a machine can be built, that is enough a
- >justification to build it. No concern is given to whether it is needed at all
- >or even whether it is downright bad for people (or nature). Engineering is our
- >new religion: we have to make progress. No one knows why, but we just have to.
- >And we want all those marvellous new technological advancements. No one knows
- >why, but we just want.
-
- Well, there are some reasons. (IMHO)
-
- I agree that progress can sometimes have negative effects but frequently
- it can be for the good. This is based on my own, personal, definitions
- of good and bad, of course.
-
- Progress in the engineering of automobiles has produced cars and trucks
- that are more effecient and cause much less pollution than their predecessors.
- Cleaning up the environment is good.
-
- I work at a national observatory and we do astronomy here. New technology
- allows us to learn more and more about the universe by looking deeper and
- more accurately into the heavens every year.
- Learning about how the world works is good.
-
- Progress in camera technology, including auto exposure and auto focus, allows
- camera users to photograph fast breaking events more easily than before.
- Interesting photographs are good.
-
- On the bad side, technology may well be partially responsible for the
- current widespread overpopulation problems in the world today. These
- large populations are causing natural resources to be used up at an
- alarming rate. Paradoxically technology may also be a solution to these
- problems if we can use it to educate the world and to build clean energy
- sources, etc.
-
- >And the more technological and the more artificial the world we live in is, the
- >more stressing our life becomes, because we are not living in a world for which
- >we were meant to. Our abilities are not needed. Machines do everything
- >better. And there comes the inevitable frustration. Not perhaps individually,
- >but on a collective level.
-
- Humans are quite adaptable, I think. Machines do things and this gives me
- more leasure time that I can spend out in the backcountry contemplating the
- serenity of a clear blue mountain lake if I so choose. Some things, like
- driving in rush hour traffic, can indeed be stressful. But you don't have
- to do it, you have an option. For instance, I ride my bicycle to work
- every day and I find it relaxing.
-
- >If we think of a hobby photographer, which I think most of the readers of this
- >list are, I see no reason why every shot should be perfect. Isn't he joy in
- >photography in gambling? That you can never be quite sure what the outcome is.
- Well, no. None of my photographs are "perfect", there is no such thing.
- I try to make a photograph that expresses what I want to express about a
- subject. If a technological feature of a camera helps me reach that end
- I think it's great. If I wanted to gamble, I would set my camera on one
- second delay and toss it into the air when I wanted to take a picture and
- gamble that the lens would be pointing in the direction I wanted when the
- shutter went off. Not a good path to self expression, I don't think.
- (sounds kind of fun though, now that I think of it.....)
-
- >To appreciate the successful photos, one must also experience failures.
-
- I agree with this, sort of. One should try to learn from one's mistakes.
-
- >
- >Mikko Lindholm
- >mlindholm@cc.helsinki.fi
-
-
- -Dyer Lytle
-
-
- --
- Dyer Lytle, National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, 602-323-4136
- Internet: lytle@noao.edu SPAN: NOAO::LYTLE (NOAO=5355)
-