home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ferkel.ucsb.edu!taco!rock!stanford.edu!ames!sun-barr!olivea!charnel!sifon!newsflash.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!cs.dal.ca!maillet@ug.cs.dal.ca
- From: maillet@cs.dal.ca (Dray Maillet)
- Newsgroups: rec.pets.cats
- Subject: Re: Raw Pork & Bacon
- Message-ID: <Bxs6Gn.DD5@cs.dal.ca>
- Date: 15 Nov 92 23:26:46 GMT
- References: <1992Nov15.164711.26912@gssec.bt.co.uk>
- Sender: maillet@cs.dal.ca (ANDRE MARC MAILLET)
- Organization: Math, Stats & CS, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
- Lines: 23
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ug2.cs.dal.ca
-
- In article <1992Nov15.164711.26912@gssec.bt.co.uk>, dgordon@gssec.bt.co.uk (David Gordon) writes:
- |> Hello Feline Folk.
- |>
- |> I've been reading the postings on raw pork with interest. Can anyone
- |> make a definitive statement on whether raw bacon is also a major no-no ?
- |>
- |> Does the curing process mean that this 'orrible little parasite thingy
- |> is wiped out or is it a bit tougher than that ?
- |>
-
- If I remember my source correctly (a book I own that is far, far away), any
- pork product (bacon, chops, ham, etc), either cooked or raw, is a no-no
- because cats have a very hard time to digest it. Kinda like my cooking in
- general. 8^)
-
- Dray and Furball (Whom I miss very much. Just one month to go!)
- --
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- |Andre M. Maillet | "Wouldn't it be nice if Education got all the money |
- |maillet@ug.cs.dal.ca | it needed and the Air Force had to hold a bake sale |
- |djtas@ac.dal.ca | to buy a new bomber." - from a bumper sticker |
- +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- This is not a .sig
-