home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!edcastle!albion
- From: albion@castle.ed.ac.uk (D J B Hunter)
- Newsgroups: rec.org.sca
- Subject: Re: Asst'd Dance Topics
- Message-ID: <28353@castle.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 17:06:10 GMT
- References: <9211172115.AA12013@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
- Organization: Edinburgh University
- Lines: 63
-
- Following up Justin du Couer's discussion of lines of couples...
- In article <9211172115.AA12013@inmet.camb.inmet.com> justin@inmet.camb.inmet.COM (Justin du Coeur MKA Mark Waks) writes:
- >Del quotes a message from Richard that I haven't seen yet:
- >>> On the question for dances "longwayes for as many as will",
- >>> However, it is important to note that in none of our period sources from
- >>> the 16th century, including Caroso, Negri and Arbeau. Arbeau, in fact,
- >>> never explicitly mentions that a basse dance or pavan should be danced by
- >>> a long line of couples. I might be more willing to accept such a longways
- >>> dance if there were any precedents at all in the period repertoire.
- >
- >Now *that* is the most interesting observation I've seen in a dog's age.
- >I have *always* heard the received wisdom that basse dances and pavans
- >are processional dances, and have never seen them danced in any other
- >way. But doing a quick dig through the two sources that I have on
- >hand that pertain to it (Arbeau and the Brussels MS, one of the main
- >basse dance sources), Richard's right -- it doesn't ever really say that
- >these dances are processional.
-
- [Excellent discussion of the information in these sources deleted]
-
- >Okay, here's a possibly-hard question for the dance mavens out there:
- >what evidence, if any, *is* there for the pavan and basse dance as
- >a *social* line-of-couples dance? Is there art that indicates it?
-
- In my far-from-exhaustive attempt to collect period pictures of dance,
- the earliest illustration of couple (as opposed to a line or circle)
- dancing that I found was from about 1390. The picture shows four couples
- in a fairly small squarish room, and they are spaced evenly in a circle
- (i.e. each couple processing around the room at an equal distance from
- the couple in front and behind).
-
- In the fifteenth century there are several illustrations that look like
- a line of couples. There's a manuscript from about 1410-20 that has a
- large outdoor scene of nobles wearing white clothing, and one group of
- 3 or 4 couples doing what looks very much like a dance, following one
- another around a curve. From 1450 or so there are several French
- illustrations of processions of couples (usually following a bride and
- groom) some of which appear to form a circle round the room. There's
- also at least one Italian painting from the same time that shows 4 or
- more couples dancing under a canopy and similarly forming a circle (this
- could be the salterello section of a ballo with a fixed number of
- couples though, rather than a procession of as many as will).
-
- These are all being described from memory - I can double check and give
- references if anyone wants. By the way, in all these pictures (I'm
- fairly sure) the ladies are on the outside of the circle. I've heard
- this explained as a development from the conversion (in which the
- lady turns forward and the man backwards so that the lady won't step on
- her train): if several couples are dancing up and down the hall and
- making conversions at each end then they will quite naturally fall into a
- long oval pattern as they pass each other and turn at the ends, with the
- men turning more or less on the spot and the ladies going around the outside.
- This is in contrast to the way I originally learned to do pavanes, with
- the ladies on the inside, with the explanation that this meant the
- ladies were taking smaller steps.
-
- If anyone has seen an earlier than 1390 illustration of a couple dance I
- would be interested to know about it, especially if it is early enough
- to be contemporary with the estampie (i.e. 12th-13th century).
-
- An interesting discussion!
-
- Caitlin de Courcy.
-