home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.org.sca
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!linus!progress!schuldy
- From: schuldy@progress.COM (Mark Schuldenfrei)
- Subject: Re: (none)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov16.163003.28911@progress.com>
- Sender: usenet@progress.com (Mr. Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: ellis
- Organization: Progress Software Corp.
- References: <2B5F4B06A000058E@UALR.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 16:30:03 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- Braendur, thanks very much for posting the Meridian Law about Patents
- of Arms. For the trivia minded, did anyone else spot the two Corpora
- violations in the old law?
-
- Braendur also wrote:
- I therefore decided that this was the reason for the BOD's decision.
-
- Nope. The Board decision was to disallow the awarding of a Patent
- of Arms alone, without the concomitant award of a Peerage of some
- type. This ruling was based strictly on Corpora, and not on
- Meridian Law.
-
- Tibor
- --
- Mark Schuldenfrei (schuldy@progress.com)
- [I'm just showin' you my opinions: this ain't a gift]
-