home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!yale!cs.yale.edu!rtnmr.chem.yale.edu!rescorla
- From: rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu (Eric Rescorla)
- Subject: Re: HELMETS
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.022638.20128@cs.yale.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.yale.edu (Usenet News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
- Organization: Rescorla for himself.
- References: <1992Nov18.121615.3330@cs.hw.ac.uk> <1992Nov19.001059.7670@megatek.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 02:26:38 GMT
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <1992Nov19.001059.7670@megatek.com> randy@megatek.com writes:
- >be part of the traffic, I always wear a helmet. However, I *know*, from
- >riding for ten years with and without helmets, that your awareness of your
- >surroundings at low speeds is greatly increased *without* a helmet.
- Hmm...I always find this sort of "I know" argument to be suspicious.
- People "know" a lot of things that are flat out false when empirically
- tested. Have you considered the possibility that you just think that
- your awareness of your surroundings is greatly enhanced? Have you
- tried generating a sample suite of external things to notice and
- testing this theory? If not, I suggest that you really don't have
- enough data to make such a sweeping claim--even for yourself.
- -Ekr
-
-
-
-
- --
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Eric Rescorla, DoD#431 (Nighthawk S) rescorla@rtnmr.chem.yale.edu
- Former chemist now CM400 mechanic ekr@eitech.com(preferred)
- "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."
-