home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!haven.umd.edu!mimsy!unmvax.cs.unm.edu
- From: bbx!bbxrbk!russ@unmvax.cs.unm.edu (Russ Kepler)
- Newsgroups: rec.guns
- Subject: Re: Glocks
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.055203.1230@bbxrbk>
- Date: 17 Nov 92 13:15:50 GMT
- Sender: news@mimsy.umd.edu
- Organization: /etc/organization
- Lines: 27
- Approved: gun-control@cs.umd.edu
-
- In article <57hG025l2b3S01@JUTS.ccc.amdahl.com> efk00@cd.amdahl.com (Eddie Kieger) writes:
- #
- #In article <22398@drutx.ATT.COM>, ljb@parkcity.dr.att.com
- #(BLO54620-BonhamLJ(DR2194)240) writes re Glocks:
- ##Jammed. (guy insisted on using lead reloads in violation of Mfgr's
- ##warning)
- #
- #This is unacceptable. My 1911A1 will feed Round nose lead reloads
- #FLAWLESSLY and it has never had ANY feedramp or throat work of any kind.
- #It also feeds semiwadcutters with only an occaisional jam (less than 1
- #in 100).
-
- I've never seen anything in the Glock manual mentioning lead bullets,
- and nothing on firing reloads beyond the obligitory warning that all
- manufacturer's warnings.
-
- #Is it possible to get a feed job done on a Glock to let it run lead bullets??
-
- Not necessary. I've fired a couple thousand 124 grain LRN bullets and
- 500 or so 115 grain SWC loads in a Glock 19 with no trouble and no
- rework.
-
- --
- Russ Kepler, posting from home bbxrbk!russ@bbx.basis.com
- Will hack unix for food
-
-
-